Sherman v. School Committee
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
First discharged in a “reduction in force” (RIF), then rehired, then fired again, Sherman correctly claims that he was entitled, under Ripley v. School Comm. of Norwood, 389 Mass. 610, 612-616 (1983), to the status of a tenured public school teacher (see G. L. c. 71, § 41) at the time of his second discharge. A judge of the Superior Court determined that the Whitman school committee, in dismissing Sherman, violated G. L. c. 71, § 42, by failing to furnish Sherman with any statutory ground for discharge. Accordingly, the judge ordered Sherman’s reinstatement and $105,854 in back pay.
Facts. We…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boston Teachers Union v. School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Buckley Nursing Home, Inc. v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Consolidated Freightways v. National Labor Relations Board, Charles Hennessey, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Black v. School Committee of MaldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Ryan v. Superintendent of Schools of QuincyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Storlazzi v. BakeyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- Assad v. Berlin-Boylston Regional School CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Shaw v. Board of SelectmenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
- Moore v. Industrial Demolition LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2025
- Occean v. Marriott Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1994