Cundall v. Haswell
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Assumpsit. The facts are stated in opinion. Heard on agreed statement of facts.
1Opinion of the CourtTillinghast, J.
This is assumpsit to recover the sum of $500, the same being the amount bid by the defendant for certain real estate at an execution sale thereof.
The case is before us on an agreed statement of facts, which facts, in so far as they are material to our decision, are to the following effect:
The plaintiff, in his capacity as sheriff, held an execution against one John Uniac, Jr., for service, in the sum of $20.6?. He duly levied said execution on the real estate in question, and advertised the same for sale thereunder. The defendant in this case was present at said sale and bid off the property…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gribben v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Scanlan v. CobbIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- Riggan v. . GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- Boyer v. BerrymanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Lincoln v. BuckmasterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roe v. GelineauSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Greentree Series V, Inc. v. HofmeisterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Longley v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1942
- Greentree Series V v. HofmeisterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015