Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Heckler
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 7, 1983No. 83 C 4110PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BUA, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Edna Johnson and Jerome Montgomery have moved to maintain this suit as a class action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs’ motion is hereby granted.
Background
Named plaintiffs Edna Johnson and Jerome Montgomery bring this action to challenge certain interrelated regulatory policies of defendant, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (the Secretary), governing the evaluation of disability claims brought under the Old Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance (“OASDI”) program and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,173 Michael Susman v. Lincoln American Corp., Ann Flamm and Arnold Flamm v. Rudolph Eberstadt, Jr. And Microdot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Alliance to End Repression v. James M. Rochford, Etc., American Civil Liberties Union v. Griffin B. BellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- HECKLER, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES v. LOPEZ Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Edna Johnson v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Johnson v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Holden v. HecklerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984
- Johnson v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Johnson v. HecklerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.