Legal Opinion

William Lyle WORATZECK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARIZONA BOARD of EXECUTIVE CLEMENCY, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 24, 1997No. 97-99015PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

Woratzeck, an Arizona state prisoner sentenced to death tomorrow morning at 12:05 a.m., appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) and stay of his execution. Denial of a TRO is normally not a final appealable order. However, since Woratzeck faces imminent execution, “the court will not require [Woratzeck] to go through the futile act of reapplying for permanent relief and the denial of a TRO may be treated as a de facto denial of a permanent injunction.” Graham v. Teledyne-Continental Motors, 805 F.2d 1386, 1388 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Edwards v. BalisokSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Burnsworth v. GundersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Bowens v. QuinnCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  3. Eugene Wallace Perry v. Leroy BrownleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  4. Rand v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
  5. McDonald v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API