Legal Opinion
Shuman Co. v. May
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided May 8, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WADDILL, Commissioner.
The Shuman Company appeals from a judgment upholding an award of compensation benefits to appellee, Harold L. May, on his claim against appellant and the Subsequent Injury Fund. Reversal is sought on the grounds that the Workmen’s Compensation Board: (1) Erroneously determined that appellant was estopped to deny that the parties were operating under the Workmen’s Compensation Act at the time May was injured; (2) erroneously permitted the Medical Panel (KRS 342.-121(1) to submit an incomplete report; and, (3) erroneously apportioned the award.
In October, 1954, appellee,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- B. F. Avery & Sons v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Robinson-Pettet Co. v. Workmen's Compensation BoardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- American Rolling Mill Co. v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
- L. E. Marks Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Ramey Fidelity Guaranty Company v. BroadyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Deby Coal Company v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
- Department of Finance v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968
- Kibbey v. General American Transportation Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1966
- Pargas Co. v. HaganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1968
- Hempfling v. EdingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1963