Legal Opinion
Ray v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided August 4, 1928No. A-6141PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Le Flore county of manslaughter in the first degree, and his punishment fixed at confinement for four years in the state penitentiary.
The record discloses that at the time charged defendant shot and killed one Ed Melton. The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment is not challenged, and we deem it unnecessary to make a recital of facts.
The first and second assignments of error go to the same question, that defendant was not arraigned on the amended information, and to put him…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Crain v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Garland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Rogers v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Spencer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Wood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Holt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
- Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
- Ex Parte CritserCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
- Ex Parte HackettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.