Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Barrett

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 8, 2012No. Docket No. 289011Published

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND

2Per curiam

This case is before us on remand from our Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of Ligons v Crittenton Hosp, 490 Mich 61; 803 NW2d 271 (2011) (Ligons II), in which the Court held that a medical malpractice action must be dismissed with prejudice if a defective affidavit of merit (AOM) is filed after the expiration of both the statutory limitations period and the saving period. Hoffman v Barrett, 490 Mich 890 (2011). Key to the Court’s decision in Ligons was the applicability of Waltz v Wyse, 469 Mich 642; 677 NW2d 813 (2004), in which the Court determined that MCL 600.5856 tolls…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Johanna Woodard v. University of Mich Medical CtrMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Waltz v. WyseMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Boodt v. Borgess Medical CenterMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Omelenchuk v. City of WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API