Legal Opinion

Richard L. Bujese v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 30, 1968No. 17093_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

We deem it necessary to remand this case to the District Court for purposes of holding a hearing. If the District Court finds that Bujese did not, of his own volition, knowingly and intelligently execute the election not to serve his sentence, realizing the effects of such waiver, then the application to reduce his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 should be granted.

If the District Court finds to the contrary, it may, if it deems it appropriate under all the circumstances, proceed to determine whether it would be “just and practicable”, in its opinion, to give retroactive…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Enrique Reyes Leyvas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  2. United States v. Richard L. Bujese, Bryant T. Hutchins, Jeffrey D. Bujese. Richard L. BujeseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  3. Curtis E. McCoy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gregory Comulada v. G. W. Pickett, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  2. Fred Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  3. Jack Thornton Atkinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. Paul John CarboCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. Alex PopekoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API