Legal Opinion

Jack Thornton Atkinson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 10, 1969No. 19592_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Jack Thornton Atkinson appeals from an order of the district court which denied his motion made under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate or reduce his sentence.

In 1965, appellant was convicted on twelve substantive counts of using the mails to defraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 and one count alleging conspiracy to use mails to defraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. At the conclusion of his trial, Atkinson received a sentence totaling seven years, including five-year sentences on each of the ten substantive counts to be served concurrently and two-year sentences on each of the three remaining…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Enrique Reyes Leyvas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  3. Alton T. Milam, Burr F. Sprague and Robert B. Kimball v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. Jack Thornton Atkinson v. United States of America, M. Dean Hodges v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
  5. James Doyle Cave v. United States of America, Sanford Samuel Amsterdam v. United States of America, Calvin Dennis Sirkin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Oliver Wendell Henderson and Leon Edward Jurras v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. People v. ScottSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  3. United States v. SchallDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Fuller v. Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API