State v. West
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentDe Graff, J.
I cannot concur with the views expressed by the majority on any one of the three grounds upon which an affirmance is based, to wit: (1) That the unconstitutionally of the statute under which the instant indictment is drawn cannot be raised for the first time on appeal; (2) that the testimony of the prosecutrix is corroborated, as required by Section 5488 of the Code; and (3) that there is competent or sufficient evidence proving or tending to prove that the defendant is over 25 years of age, which is a material allegation of the indictment.
I. It is urged by the State, and sustained by the.…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HanaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- State v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- State ex rel. Vandiver v. BurkeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Schwartz v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
- State v. PotterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.