Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. West

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 16, 1923Published

1DissentDe Graff, J.

I cannot concur with the views expressed by the majority on any one of the three grounds upon which an affirmance is based, to wit: (1) That the unconstitutionally of the statute under which the instant indictment is drawn cannot be raised for the first time on appeal; (2) that the testimony of the prosecutrix is corroborated, as required by Section 5488 of the Code; and (3) that there is competent or sufficient evidence proving or tending to prove that the defendant is over 25 years of age, which is a material allegation of the indictment.

I. It is urged by the State, and sustained by the.…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HanaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. State v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  3. State ex rel. Vandiver v. BurkeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Schwartz v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  5. State v. PotterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API