Legal Opinion
Heyer v. Allen Electric & Equipment Co.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided March 27, 1939No. 2813PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RAYMOND, District Judge.
Findings of Fact.
1. The individual plaintiff is a citizen of the State of New Jersey.
2. The corporate plaintiff is a New Jersey corporation.
3. Defendant Firestone Tire & Rubber Company is a West Virginia corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, an Ohio corporation.
4. Defendant Allen Electric & Equipment Company is a Michigan corporation.
5. This is a suit for infringement of design patent No. 95,041 for combined charging and testing apparatus and stock stand, issued April 2, 1935, on application filed November 16, 1934; and also…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bristol v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Applied Arts Corp. v. Grand Rapids Metalcraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- Strause Gas Iron Co. v. William M. Crane Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Imperial Glass Co. v. HeiseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
- Myers v. SternheimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Heyer v. Allen Electric & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941