Legal Opinion

Calloway v. City of Fayetteville

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 18, 2009No. A09A0551PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBURN, Presiding Judge.

W H. Calloway filed suit against the City of Fayetteville and its councilmen to invalidate two annexation ordinances, in which the City annexed his property and zoned it as commercial. The trial court granted summary judgment to the City and its councilmen (and concomitantly denied summary judgment to Calloway), holding that the annexation ordinances were lawfully adopted. We agree and affirm.

Summary judgment is only proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Bradley Plywood Corp. v. MAYOR & ALDERMEN OF CITY OF SAVANNAHCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Worley v. Peachtree CityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Cherokee County, Georgia v. Inline Communities, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API