Legal Opinion

Chandler v. Pomeroy

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 1, 1899No. 8PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal-from tbe Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey.

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, District Judge.

This is an appeal by Frank R. Chandler and others from a decree entered by the circuit court for the district of New Jersey dismissing exceptions to and confirming a master’s report. The facts of the case are fully stated in the opinion of the supreme court of the United States directing an accounting (Chandler v. Pomeroy, 143 U. S. 318, 12 Sup. Ct. 410), and the subsequent opinion of the circuit court upon such accounting (Chandler v. Pomeroy, 87 Fed. 262). They need not, therefore, be here restated.

*157The first, second, third, and fourth, assignments allege the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chandler v. PomeroySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Chandler v. PomeroyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1898
  3. Chandler v. PomeroyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. P. P. Mast & Co. v. Superior Drill Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
  2. Ward v. ShermanArizona Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API