Legal Opinion

Westergreen v. Beer

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1914No. Civ. No. 1391PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

In this action the defendants’ demurrer to the plaintiffs’ second amended complaint was sustained by the court below without leave to amend. Judgment was thereupon entered in favor of the defendants, from which the plaintiffs have appealed.

The grounds of the demurrer were that the complaint did not state a cause of action, and that the plaintiffs did not have legal capacity to sue.

The action was one to declare a resulting trust in certain real property, and to compel a conveyance to plaintiffs of their alleged respective interests therein, and is founded upon the following alleged…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bacon v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. Odell v. MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Starkweather v. JennerSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Hopper v. HopperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894
  5. Peck v. LockridgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Myers v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Hanley v. Federal Mining & Smelting Co.District Court, D. Idaho · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API