Legal Opinion

Stephens Media, LLC v. Eighth Judicial District Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 2009No. 52399PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Hardesty, C.J.:

This petition for extraordinary writ relief challenges the district court’s denial of petitioners’ motion to intervene in a criminal trial for the limited purpose of accessing juror questionnaires. In reviewing this petition, we must address two issues of first impression. First, we must resolve whether petitioners’ motion to intervene in a criminal case to seek access to juror questionnaires is procedurally proper. Second, we are asked to determine whether juror questionnaires used in jury selection are subject to public disclosure. This second inquiry…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Estes v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Yakima County v. Yakima Herald-RepublicWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Haley v. DIST. CT.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Emerson v. Eighth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  4. In re Access to Jury QuestionnairesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Yakima v. Yakima Herald-RepublicWashington Supreme Court · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API