In re Access to Jury Questionnaires
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OBERLY, Associate Judge:
Soon after the start of Ingmar Guan-dique’s trial for the murder of Chandra Levy, The Washington Post (“The Post”) sought access to the jury questionnaires completed by the sixteen empaneled jurors. When informal attempts to gain access were denied, The Post filed a motion to intervene, arguing that both the common law and the First Amendment create a presumption of public access to jury questionnaires used in voir dire. After the trial ended, the court issued an oral ruling denying access, concluding that disclosure of the jury questionnaires would discourage juror…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jonathan Blades v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- In Re Special ProceedingsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Facebook, Inc. v. James PepeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2020
- Jonathan Blades v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- Jonathan Blades v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.