Barbarich v. Meyer

The only question involved herein is the validity of the- title to certain real estate, which appellant has been condemned t'o accept, as having been the adjudieatee thereof at a public sale to effect a partition between the parties named in the title hereto. He raises three objections.

I

He complains that the parties have not been put in possession thereof as heirs of the one through whom they derive title, contradictorily with the inheritance tax collector, as required by Act's 109 of 1906 and 199 of 1920.

*328In Bonvillain v. Richaud, 153 La. 431, 96 South. 21, this court said:

“Act No. 109 of…