Legal Opinion

United States v. Elizondo

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided November 15, 1989No. ACMR 8801805PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT ON FURTHER REVIEW

FOREMAN, Senior Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted the appellant of three specifications of making and uttering worthless checks, in violation of Article 123a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 923a (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. His approved sentence provides for a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 12 months, forfeiture of $200.00 pay per month for 12 months, and reduction to Private El. Four of the six court members recommended that the bad-conduct discharge and all…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. BrandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  2. United States v. HensleyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  3. United States v. ElizondoU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. CamposU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  2. United States v. AndersonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API