Legal Opinion

State v. Francis

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 2017No. Case No. 20150616PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice Pearce, opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 Samuel Aaron Francis and the State entered into a plea agreement the weekend before Francis's trial. The State rescinded its offer before Francis entered his plea because Francis's alleged victim objected to the agreement. Francis's counsel then represented to the district court that she was not ready for trial because she had ceased trial preparation once she believed the parties had reached a plea agreement. The district court continued trial. Francis later filed a motion to enforce the plea agreement. The district court denied Francis's…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. People v. EvansIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. United States v. Michael Hendricks Jaysen Ringling, A/K/A John KasellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Michael Joe Olesen, United States of America v. Michael Gene LandonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  2. State v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  3. Commonwealth v. Cosby, Jr., W., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. State v. HaugenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  5. State v. MolinaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API