Legal Opinion

The Edward Luckenback

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 5, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Admiralty. On application for taxation of costs.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, District Judge.

In this case the libelant’s vessel and the claimants’ vessel being both held in fault, the damages were directed to be divided. The claimants’ vessel was not injured by the collision, so that there was no cross libel, nor any damages set up in the answer. The libelant claims an allowance of half his costs, without taking into consideration the costs of the respondent. The latter contends that the practice in this district, in cases of mutual fault, is that the costs of both sides shall be divided as well as the damages,— the same as if a cross libel had been filed for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The Max MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Kennard v. Louisiana Ex Rel. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. The Max MorrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1885
  4. Davis v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co.United States Circuit Court · 1885
  5. Curry v. The Max MorrisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ore Carriers of Liberia, Inc. v. Navigen Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  2. The Frank S. HallDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Glen Southern Shipping Corp. v. Norfolk Towing Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1956
  4. The Garden CityDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1916
  5. The YarmouthDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API