State v. Wilson, Unpublished Decision (1-10-2008)

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

{¶ 1} After entering pleas of guilty to charges of rape and gross sexual imposition, defendant-appellant Rashaad Wilson appeals from the trial court's classification of him as a sexual predator.

{¶ 2} Wilson presents one assignment of error in which he claims the trial court's classification lacks adequate evidentiary support. Based upon the record, this court cannot agree. Consequently, the trial court's classification is affirmed.

{¶ 3} Wilson, nineteen years old at the time, originally was indicted in this case on three counts that charged him with rape, gross sexual…