McIntire v. Eastman
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Dickinson District Court. — Hon. Q-eoroeH. Carr, Judge. Action to recover the possession of a mule. A bond was filed by plaintiff, and a writ of replevin was issued, and served by taking and returning the mule to plaintiff. The cause was tried to a jury, and a verdict and judgment rendered for defendant. The plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
— Plaintiff leased to one Sutton a farm in Clay county for the term of one year, commencing on the first day of April, 1886. By the terms of the lease Sutton was to deliver to plaintiff, on the farm, as rental, one-half of all the oats, and one-third of all the corn, which should be raised, and one-third of all the hay which should be cut thereon. On the tenth day of April, 1886, plaintiff and Sutton made a supplemental agreement, by the terms of which plaintiff was to have one-half of all the grain raised on the farm during the term of the lease, “in consideration of the use of one mule and…
2Cited by7 opinions
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. HillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
- Citizens State Bank v. First National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Hartley State Bank v. McCorkellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Powers v. BensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Harlan v. MennengaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.