State v. Fleming

¶1 A jury entered a verdict finding Harry Fleming III guilty of theft of rental, leased, or lease-purchased property, contrary to former RCW 9A.56-.096 (2003). Fleming appeals his conviction, arguing that the trial court erred by admitting unreliable hearsay evidence under the business record exception rule, by admitting hearsay evidence in violation of his Sixth Amendment confrontation rights, and by giving a “presumption of intent to deprive” jury instruction. Fleming also argues that sufficient evidence does not support his conviction. Al*494though sufficient evidence supports the jury’s…