Legal Opinion

Monsour v. Cady

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided May 31, 1972No. Civ. A. 70-C-190PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

REYNOLDS, Chief Judge.

This is an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 2241. A response was ordered from the respondent Elmer O. Cady. Counsel was appointed by the court to assist the petitioner in prosecuting his petition and a hearing on the petition was held, at which time I indicated that I would have to find against the petitioner. Herewith are my findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order.

On May 12, 1969, petitioner appeared in the County Court of Waukesha County, Wisconsin, and entered pleas of guilty to twelve charges pending against…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Parker v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. David Busby v. William C. Holman, Warden, Kilby PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kurt Stevenson v. James W. Mathews, Warden, Wisconsin Correctional Camp System, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  2. Monsour v. CadyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  3. State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API