Legal Opinion

Weedman v. Moutardier

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided June 24, 2021No. 4:19-cv-00131Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY OWENSBORO DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:19CV-00131-JHM CHARLES WEEDMAN, JR. PLAINTIFF VS. TIM MOUTARDIER, et al. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on a motion by Defendants, Tim Moutardier and Brandon Puckett, for summary judgment. [DN 27]. Plaintiff did not respond to the motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. I. STANDARD OF REVIEW Before the Court may grant a motion for summary judgment, it must find that there is no genuine dispute as to any…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API