Legal Opinion

Solano Aquatic Club v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1913No. S.F. No. 6334PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Certiorari to review several orders of the Superior Court of Solano County adjudging the petitioner to be in contempt. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Certiorari to review three several orders of the superior court of the county of Solano, adjudicating petitioner, the Solano Aquatic Club, to be in contempt for continuing to operate its ferry service upon three separate days, after notice that a temporary restraining order prohibiting it from so doing had theretofore been issued from the court.

The violation of the temporary injunction is not questioned. The principal contention is that the restraining order itself is void. The reasons advanced are those which have been considered and decided adversely to petitioner’s contention in the case…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Overend v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Golden Gate Consolidated Hydraulic Mining Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Ex parte SticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Vallejo Ferry Co. v. Solano Aquatic ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re ShulerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Donovan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. In Re StaffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Williams v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. In Re ToorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API