Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Nevins

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1914PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Demtjbbeb to complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtErlanger, J.

Alleging that the defendants, direct- ''' ors of a Maine corporation, doing business in this state, “ wilfully and fraudulently ” voted and paid dividends to stockholders from capital, the plaintiff sues at law as receiver of the corporation appointed in supplementary proceedings in an action brought by a creditor in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and seeks judgment for the gross amount of the dividends so declared and paid out. The complaint further sets forth the substance of a statute of the state of Maine whereby a criminal responsibility is imposed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marshall v. . ShermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. National Bank v. . DillinghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Cody v. First National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  4. Hutchinson v. StadlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. Darcy v. Brooklyn & New York Ferry Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Doehler v. Real Estate Board of New York Building Co.New York Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Walker v. ManNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Island Paper Co. v. Carthage Timber Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Shalek v. Jetter Brewing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1915
  5. City Investing Co. v. GerkenNew York Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API