Legal Opinion
Walker v. Man
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 5, 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
The defendant Man moves for judgment dismissing the amended complaint on the ground generally that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against him, and specifically moves to dismiss the first, second, third, fourth, seventh, eighth, ninth, tenth and eleventh causes of action on the ground that it appears on the face of each one thereof that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against him.
The litigation is by the trustee in bankruptcy of Frederick Southack & Alwyn Ball, Jr., Inc., and seeks to recover $1,677,411.19 ' from the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pollitz v. . Wabash R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Sage v. . CulverNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Kavanaugh v. . Kavanaugh Knitting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Darcy v. Brooklyn & New York Ferry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Marcus v. OtisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- McGlynn v. SchultzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Quinn v. PostDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Doehler v. Real Estate Board of New York Building Co.New York Supreme Court · 1934
- Platt Corp. v. PlattNew York Supreme Court · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.