Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. John v. Morris

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1893No. 53PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Original Application for mandamus. It was sought by this proceeding to obtain a mandamus requiring district judge F. G. Morris to vacate an injunction issued by him prohibitjing the counting and certifying of the vote in an election upon local option held in Williamson County. Judge Morris filed answer, among other things urging the grounds sustained in the opinion of the court. . The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Associate Justice.

This is an original proceeding in this court, in the name of the State of Texas, upon the relation of R. A. John, county attorney, joined by D. S. Chessher, county judge of Williamson County, in which it is sought to have this court issue a mandamus against Hon. F. G. Morris, judge of the Twenty-sixth Judicial District. G. E. King and G. W. Scott intervened.

The facts necessary to an understanding of the questions decided are as follows: The Commissioners Court of Williamson County, upon a proper petition, ordered an election for said county to be held on the 11th day…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Noyes & Pettingill v. HewittNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Ewing v. CohenTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Ex Parte Jesse HoytSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  4. State ex rel. Hyatt v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  5. Ex parte NelsonNew York Supreme Court · 1823

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fulton v. FinchTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. McDowell v. HightowerTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. BlairTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Ben C. Jones & Co. v. WheelerTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Buvens v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1928

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API