Legal Opinion

Fitzpatrick v. Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 11, 2001No. [No. 11, September Term, 1959.]PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPrescott, J.

This appeal is the natural sequel to Hawkins v. Ghent, 154 Md. 261, 140 A. 212, wherein it was held that the primary life estates created under the will of Amanda M. Hawkins *538were not violative of the rule against perpetuities (Rule) and, therefore, valid; but the question of the validity of the subsequent limitations—all being contingent—was left open.

In 1876, John W. Hawkins and Amanda Hawkins, his wife, conveyed certain real and personal property to Augustine James Dalrymple in trust for Amanda Hawkins, one of the grantors, during her life. The deed of trust, among other things, directed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Graham v. WhitridgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
  2. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. SheehanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  3. Lamkin v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  4. Ryan v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  5. Wyeth v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of Bowie v. MIE, Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Arundel Corp. v. MarieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Ferrero Construction Co. v. Dennis Rourke Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  4. Selig v. State Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. Karsenty v. SchoukrounCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API