Legal Opinion

Noble v. Bessemer Steamship Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1901PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Bay; Sharpe, J., presiding. Case by William B. Noble against the Bessemer Steamship Company for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is an action on the case for the recovery of damages on account of the loss of an eye. From a judgment of $4,000 obtained by plaintiff, defendant has brought the case here by writ of error.

Plaintiff was employed as a calker upon a vessel being constructed at F. W. Wheeler & Co.’s yard in West Bay *105City by defendant. Wheeler & Co. had commenced the work, but, failing in the performance of its contract, the» defendant took the yard and crew, and proceeded to finish it. Plaintiff commenced working for Wheeler & Co., and continued when defendant took over the operation of the yard. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Chicago & North Western Railroad v. SwettIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Hunn v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Wachsmuth v. Shaw Electric Crane Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Hefferen v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Slovick v. James I. Barnes Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Phillips' AdministratixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
  3. Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. HolcombeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. HensleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Lobenstein v. Whitehead & Kales Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API