Warfel v. Vondersmith
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern,
While there does not appear to be any precedent in Pennsylvania controlling the decision of the present appeal ah application of the established principles governing other aspects of the problem supports the view taken by the court below and calls for an affirmance of its order.
The facts are these: Plaintiff, a general contractor, entered into a contract with Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., to demolish old structures and erect a new building on property belonging to it in the City of Lancaster. The new building was of heavy construction and required…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Neyman v. PincusMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Eads v. GainsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
- Carpenter v. Reliance Realty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- Braun v. HamackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- First National Bank v. VillegraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bradley v. ValicentiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- RHOADS INDUSTRIES, INC. v. SHORELINE FOUNDATION, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- RHOADS INDUSTRIES, INC. v. TRITON MARINE CONSTRUCTION CORP.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022