Legal Opinion
Werner v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 4, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2013-1801PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs James Werner, Christine Bird, and their son N.W. contend that the District of Columbia (“the District”) deprived N.W. of his right to a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) under the Individuals with. Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq. Compl. ¶ 1. Plaintiffs initially filed a complaint with the District of Columbia Public Schools (“DCPS”) Student Hearing Office, alleging three related claims. At the statutorily-mandated due process hearing, the DCPS hearing officer concluded that…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lannan Found. v. GingoldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- American Civil Construction, LLC v. Fort Myer Construction Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Lague v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Lannan Foundation v. GingoldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017