Application of Arthur E. Troiel
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the final rejection of claims 2, 4, 5 and 10, the only claims remaining in application Serial No. 165,039, filed May 29, 1950, entitled “Hole Cap and Tool Therefor.”
In setting up forms into which concrete is poured for making structures such as walls, dams, etc., ofttimes, either initially or in reuse, the lumber used has holes or other imperfections in its surfaces. To prevent the concrete, as it is poured into the forms, from escaping through holes and to provide a smooth surfaced concrete…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Electric Cable Joint Co. v. Brooklyn Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Application of WorrestCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- In re AttwoodCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Application of BeltzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- In re BennettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Jeffrey B. Gorman and Marilyn KatzCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Ellicott MacHine Corporation v. The United States and American Marine and MacHinery Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Application of Everett F. GustafsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964