Legal Opinion
Bregman v. Meehan
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 25, 1984PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Beatrice S. Burstein, J.
Liability having been previously determined by order dated November 14, 1983 (Vitale, J.) and affirmed by decision of the Appellate Division dated July 2, 1984 (103 AD2d 1050), the only issue before this court on the Bench trial of this action was the remedy to be awarded plaintiffs, who seek specific performance of a contract for the sale of residential real property and damages.
Based upon the credible testimony and other admitted evidence, and pursuant to CPLR 4213, the court finds and concludes as follows:
Plaintiffs, a young couple who are about…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Da Silva v. MussoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Bostwick v. . BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Simon v. . EtgenNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Sleeth v. . SampsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Regan v. LanzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mercantile National Bank at Dallas v. Bradford Trust Company, N/k/a Fidata Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Destiny USA Holdings, LLC v. Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Bregman v. Meehan (In Re Meehan)District Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- In Re MeehanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- Lotito v. MazzeoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.