Legal Opinion

G. R. Frank & Sons, Inc. v. Kutner

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County

Decided October 17, 1975No. 75-58, 35-331Published

1Opinion of the Court

BECKERT, J.,

The present matter is before us on defendant’s prehminary objections to a mechanic’s lien claim filed by plaintiff to recover money purportedly due to plaintiff for its installation of an outdoor tennis court on premises owned by defendant. While the preliminary objections are three in number, the first raised we find to be dispositive of the matter and, therefore, need not touch on the remaining two.

The issue presented to us by the prehminary objection is: Does the installation of an outdoor tennis court fall within the scope of Mechanics’ Lien Law of 1963, Act of August 24,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sampson-Miller Associated Companies v. Landmark Realty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Tesauro v. BAIRDSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Parkhill v. HendricksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API