Legal Opinion

Day v. Pool

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1872PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL, by the plaintiffs, from a judgment of nonsuit ordered at the Chautauqua circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtTaloott, J.

The defendants are merchants in blew York, dealing in syrups. The plaintiffs are manufacturers of wine, at Brocton, in Chautauqua county. In September, 1870, the plaintiffs, by parol, made an executory contract to purchase of the defendants eighty barrels of rock candy syrup, to be used by the plaintiffs in the manufacture of wine. At the time of the order given by the plaintiffs to the defendants, several samples of syrups were exhibited by the defendants, one of which was selected by the plaintiffs, and the order given for syrup of that description. At the time of the agreement for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reed v. . RandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  2. McCormick v. . SarsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Foot v. . BentleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  4. Neaffie v. HartNew York Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brigg v. . HiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Hooper v. StoryNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Ames v. Norwich Light Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  4. Ames v. Norwich Light Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API