Hooper v. Story
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by Francis X. Hooper, W. Ross Wilson, and Edmund V. Hermanye against John T. Story, Albert E. Fox, and Frederick G-. Fox. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.
Hone of the evidence is here. The questions arise upon the exceptions to the conclusions of law of the referee, and those conclusions are dependent for support upon the facts as found by him. The referee found that the plaintiffs agreed to make and deliver to the defendants an extra large varnishing machine, to connect with a certain drier, at a certain price, and represented, agreed, and warranted that it should be of capacity sufficient to properly varnish 10,000 sheets of labels or advertisements per day, and be complete in all its parts; that the machine delivered to the defendants was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Reed v. . RandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Day v. . PoolNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Brown v. . FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Fairbank Canning Co. v. . MetzgerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Studer v. . BleisteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Boessneck v. William Taylor Son & Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904
- Ames v. Norwich Light Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Ames v. Norwich Light Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897