General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Hollander
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.
Plaintiff, as successor to all the rights of Thos. Cusack Co., demands cancellation of a lease made by its predecessor, with defendant for use of roof of building at 538-542 Camp, Street, for advertising purposes on the ground that defendant had violated its obligation by permitting the use of other signs on the building.
*340After filing exception of no cause of action and vagueness, which were overruled, defendant answered denying generally the breach and urging as a special defense, “estoppel,” on the ground that defendant had judgment, later affirmed by this Court, in a suit against Thos.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
- Woodcock v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
- Plicque & Lebeau v. PerretSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
- Knapp v. GuerinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
- Succession of DurnfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1846
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Price v. Town of RustonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Lerner v. BischoffLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940