Legal Opinion

General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Hollander

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 1928No. 10,893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

Plaintiff, as successor to all the rights of Thos. Cusack Co., demands cancellation of a lease made by its predecessor, with defendant for use of roof of building at 538-542 Camp, Street, for advertising purposes on the ground that defendant had violated its obligation by permitting the use of other signs on the building.

*340After filing exception of no cause of action and vagueness, which were overruled, defendant answered denying generally the breach and urging as a special defense, “estoppel,” on the ground that defendant had judgment, later affirmed by this Court, in a suit against Thos.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  2. Woodcock v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  3. Plicque & Lebeau v. PerretSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
  4. Knapp v. GuerinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  5. Succession of DurnfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1846

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Price v. Town of RustonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Lerner v. BischoffLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API