Lerner v. Bischoff
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1DissentJanvier, Justice
The only issue presented — whether the indebtedness sued on exists' — has never been passed upon. My associates concede this, for in the majority opinion it is stated that the first suit was. dismissed “because it was evident that plaintiff was not in a position to produce written proof of the indebtedness”. The only question which was involved in the earlier suit was whether parol evidence of the debt should be admitted in view of the fact that the suit had been brought more than twelve months after the death of the alleged debtor. Our opinion in that first case shows clearly that only that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
- Laenger v. LaengerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- West v. His CreditorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1848
- R. McWilliams, Ltd v. Gulf States Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- Adkins v. CasonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.