Legal Opinion

Southern Casualty Co. v. Todd

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1930No. 1185—5518PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShort, P. J.

The plaintiff in er-ror, in its application for the writ of error, makes the following correct statement of the nature' and result of this suit. The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals also gives the full statement of the nature and result of the suit. 18 S.W.(2d) 695.

“This is an action 'begun in the District Court of Dallas County, Texas, by Charles Todd, defendant in error, against Southern Casualty Company, plaintiff in error, as insurer, under the Workmen’s Compensation Act to recover his alleged damages for person.al injuries resulting in total and permanent disability while in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Todd v. Southern Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Jones v. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pearce v. Texas Employers Insurance AssociationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  2. Employers Reinsurance Corporation v. HoltTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Commercial Casualty Ins. Co. v. HiltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Texas State Highway Department v. FillmonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Holt v. Employers Reinsurance CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API