Legal Opinion
Oglesby v. Attrill
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana
Decided February 15, 1882PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Motion to take Amended Bill from the Files.
1Opinion of the CourtPardee, C. J.
The original bill, in its widest scope, is a bill to impeach a judgment rendered at law, and to procure a new trial in the case where the judgment was rendered. It was only for such a bill that substituted service was ordered by the court. It is only for such a bill that the defendant is before the court.
Under leave obtained from the court complainants have amended their bill by setting up matters not pertinent to the question of a *215new trial or to the impeachment of the judgment rendered, but tending to charge the defendant, as trustee for the complainants, for a large amount of gas stock,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Minnesota Co. v. St. Paul Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Miller v. . BarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Cole Silver Min. Co. v. Virginia & Gold Hill Water Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1871
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commercial Union of America, Inc. v. Anglo-South American Bank, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Shreve v. CheesmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Hardy v. North Butte Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Taylor v. Decatur Mineral & Land Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Alabama · 1901
- Collin County Nat. Bank of McKinney v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.