Legal Opinion

Dotson v. Harman

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 26, 1986No. Record 831723PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

The sole question in this appeal is whether the trial court correctly applied the doctrine of res judicata. We conclude that the doctrine was inapplicable and that the court erred in applying it.

In 1973, Bill R. Harman and Dorothy Woosley Harman, his wife, were the owners of a tract of land in Russell County described as Block C of the Russell County Poor Farm subdivision. The Harmans caused Block C, together with additional parts of the Poor Farm Subdivision, to be resubdivided by recording, on April 26, 1973, a subdivision deed and plat creating the “Harman Subdivision.” The plat depicted a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bates v. DeversSupreme Court of Virginia · 1974
  2. Wright v. CastlesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  3. Mowry v. City of Virginia BeachSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  4. Burks Bros. of Virginia, Inc. v. JonesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
  5. Sipe v. AlleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Water Control Board v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  2. Leeman v. Troutman Builds, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2000
  3. Dual & Associates, Inc. v. WellsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  4. Citizens for Fauquier County v. SPR Corp.Fauquier County Circuit Court · 1995
  5. Londono-Rivera v. VirginiaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API