Legal Opinion

People v. Scott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 3, 1995PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied the motion to suppress admissions made by defendant in a post-polygraph interview with police and in a “letter of apology” written to his wife. Although defendant argues that his will was completely overborne by the improper conduct and undue pressure of the police, defendant does not contend that the polygraphist misrepresented the results of the polygraph (see, Matter of Sandra S., 195 AD2d 1070, 1071; People v Melendez, 149 AD2d 918). The polygraphist politely, but repeatedly, impressed upon defendant the importance of telling…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. HenryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. People v. DeskovicAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. People v. MelendezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. In re Sandra S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. People v. CamachoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. People v. PeayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. People v. VoorheesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. People v. AeidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API