Legal Opinion

Ryan v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 27, 2006PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The primary question presented on this appeal is whether a motor vehicle lessee may invoke the provisions of a manufacturer’s warranty under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Federal Trade Commission Improvement Act. 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 2301-2312.

I

The facts of the case are detailed in the decision of the Appellate Division. Ryan v. Am. Honda Motor Corp., 376 N.J.Super. 185, 187-89, 869 A.2d 945 (App.Div.2005). Briefly, plaintiff, Christopher Ryan, entered into a closed-end vehicle lease with Burns Honda, an authorized dealer and repair facility for defendant, American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (American…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  2. Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Ass'n of The United States, Inc. v. AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  3. Dekelaita v. Nissan Motor Corp. in USAAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. Miller Auto Leasing Co. v. WeinsteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  5. Ryan v. American Honda Motor Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Real v. Radir Wheels, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  2. Park City Services, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Christine Seney v. Rent-a-Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  4. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. v. CerasaniSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  5. Mago v. Mercedes-Benz, U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API