Legal Opinion

Potter v. Mulberry

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1979No. 12734Published

1Opinion of the Court

599 P.2d 1000 (1979)

100 Idaho 429

Helen POTTER and Neldon Potter, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants and Cross-Respondents,

v.

Theodore E. MULBERRY and Nora Ann Mulberry, husband and wife, Defendants-Respondents and Cross-Appellants.

No. 12734.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

September 6, 1979.

Dean Williams, of Kerr, Williams & Clarke, Blackfoot, for plaintiffs-appellants and cross-respondents.

Morton B. Hiller, of St. Clair, Hiller, Benjamin, Wood & McGrath, Idaho Falls, for defendants-respondents and cross-appellants.

BISTLINE, Justice.

This personal injury and property damage action arose out of a…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stoddard v. NelsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Davis v. Nelson-Deppe, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Bean v. Diamond Alkali CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Grohusky v. Atlas Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  5. Coughran v. HickoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API