(PS) Vitaly v. Arcade Creek Recreation Park District

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KONONOV VITALY, No. 2:24-cv-01743-KJM-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ARCADE CREEK RECREATION PARK DISTRICT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action. This matter was accordingly referred to the 18 undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has filed a request for leave to proceed in forma 19 pauperis (“IFP”) and has submitted the affidavit required by that statute. See 28 U.S.C. 20 § 1915(a)(1). The motion to proceed IFP will therefore be granted. However, for…