Legal Opinion

Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 13, 1976No. 76-770-E-3, CA 6657PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.

A dispute between two insurance carriers as to which of them must bear the costs of the claimant’s present disability is the crux of this workmen’s compensation case. In order to resolve that dispute this court must, in effect, determine whether claimant’s existing disability is attributable, wholly or in part, to a compensable injury suffered by her in June 1974 while she was employed by Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. (3M).

Having considered the testimony of the claimant and all relevant medical evidence, the referee concluded that her low back problem reflected a "general worsened…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Ed's Pancake HouseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. Cutright v. American Ship DismantlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  3. Calder v. Hughes & LaddCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  4. D. R. Johnson Lumber Co. v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. Gardner v. Underwriters Adjusting Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kolar v. B & C CONTRACTORSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. Tucker v. Jack Ensley CompanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Kolar v. B & C CONTRACTORSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API