Legal Opinion

Garcia v. Yedor

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1944No. Civ. 14609PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DRAPEAU, J. pro tem.

In this case the trial court rendered judgment on the pleadings. Therefore, the only question to be determined is whether the amended complaint states a cause of action. (Union Flower M. v. Southern Cal. Flower M., 10 Cal.2d 671 [76 P.2d 503]; Bradley Co. v. Ridgeway, 14 Cal.App.2d 326 [58 P.2d 194].)

The amended complaint alleges that defendants operated a die easting plant, with employees, machinery, tools and equipment; that the plaintiff was an employee of the defendants; that the plaintiff entered the plant before it was time for him to go to work, and went to a part…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Freire v. Matson Navigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Whiting-Mead Commercial Co. v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Judson Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Union FM v. Southern Cal. FMCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Bradley Co. v. RidgewayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Scott v. Pacific Coast Borax Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Seymour v. Setzer Forest Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. California Insurance Guarantee Ass'n v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Oliva v. Goleta Lemon Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API