Freburg v. City of Davenport
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Muscatine District Oou/rt. AotioN to recover damages caused by the alleged negligence of the city in failing to provide sufficient outlets for surface water. Trial by jury, verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.
-After stating that the plaintiff is the owner of certain real estate situate witbin the city, the petition proceeds as follows:
“ That petitioner’s bouse is located on east end of said premises, and fronting on Mississippi avenue;'that a ravine runs *120through said premises from north to south, and west of, and lower than, the foundations of plaintiff’s house, which, at the time of plaintiff’s purchase of said premises and for a long time thereafter, afforded an outlet for the surface water falling on the streets and properties north of the plaintiff’s said premises; that the city, by its street…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Weis v. City of MadisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Livingston v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
- Ellis v. Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
3Cited by9 opinions
- Knostman & Peterson Furniture Co. v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Gilluly v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
- Hume v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Morris v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Adams v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.